Background
With the debut of FSRS-5 in Anki 24.11, there's now considerable controversy surrounding whether FSRS should control short-term intervals. Additionally, some inaccurate information about short-term memory is spreading.
Therefore, I feel it necessary to provide some clarification.
Fact
- In Anki 24.11, when FSRS is enabled and (re)learning steps are left blank, FSRS can control the (re)learning steps when it deems necessary (when the next interval < 12h).
- FSRS-5 was not initially designed to model short-term memory. Its primary focus was on considering the impact of short-term reviews on long-term memory.
- During the optimization of FSRS-5 parameters, short-term review results were not used as labels in supervised learning. Using a next token prediction analogy, short-term reviews appeared only in the input/context tokens, not in the next tokens.
- Benchmarks show that considering short-term reviews improves long-term memory prediction accuracy. However, this doesn't necessarily mean FSRS-5 can accurately predict short-term memory.
- Recent experiments involving short-term review results as optimization labels led to a significant increase in FSRS prediction errors and overly conservative long-term memory predictions. This suggests that long-term and short-term memory patterns may differ, and using a single model to predict both may not be ideal.
- Short-term reviews have a significant impact on short-term memory. But it’s too complicate to model.
FAQs
Most of my answers are based on my open-source research: open-spaced-repetition/short-term-memory-research
What inspired the module considering same-day reviews in FSRS-5?
The inspiration came from my research on short-term review data:
